When everybody keeps silent about it, it's almost as if it doesn't exist. Well kindled in solitary minds no doubt. I've been concerning myself with how habits of a high frequency, social nature will influence the nature and development of human cognition. Intuition suggests that there, in the context of a system in which habit becomes a non-translative groundwork for an emergent system (for example, biological systems and the conscious mind), is a point of no return - a habit whose inputs and outputs are of an equality (a stable habit whose state rarely deviates with no emergent), or a point of emergence beyond which a habit has one dependant input or output (the point of emergence is likely based on a habit of a certain weight (in other words, a strong periodic creating a force (emergent operator?)), where a higher order structure is reliant upon its superstructure rarely deviating.) I'm concerned about systemic entropy, the amount of potential states of a system given a 'high frequency cutoff' - i.e. the lower level habits are not considered potentially changeable, as the structure of the unified 'object' of emergent systems would be threatened - it is instead treated as a vector, a boundary on the number of potential states the system can generate (and therefore, a limit (ponr) on interpretation of external information and its relevancy and application from the system's context).
Predictability of potential outcomes: low complexity, easy to predict emergent systems
