shh is fuu

ErrorGeom

errorgeomex.web.app

errorgeomex.web.app

errorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.apperrorgeomex.web.app

you make me feel like shit. -not red team

conch o

my beans

pocket pinch socket

qvyxfgbàfi

Stay Awake

 I look back on my time in the room as the sliver of moonlight left of myself

A comet leaving trails of movement in particulate matter, the darkness still very much awake.

The message was the sky this morning, a kindness in the sun.

I'd looked through eyes finitely deeply until my dreams met the day.

This morning, I'd had to escape a wooden recluse. (I'd return to the smell of turpentine).

The strange scents of Exeter had returned and I was able to read the machine, free of my body's riposte. There was real oxygen filling the hollow chambers of the scaled models. The smell of current through metal, this time, contained and beautiful in implication. The perfume of passers by. The world was working. The sky led me through. I followed the road back today with the sun in my eyes.

There was danger on the way. Not enough information to commit to a decision. The flight out of here looked at the road through glass eyes. Without so much attention to detail, it needed less energy than the environment would require to traverse it. I remembered the nucleic glow and measured it through the windscreen. It seemed to be getting further, I doubted my own instruction and elected to walk through the grid. Summer was still there. My waking body's unsettling dream doubted until my body would react to decide. Windows were full of rooms. 

Around the occluded edges there were ripples in time. Roads were deeper. The edge folded in on itself. In the darkness, people moved. They were not bound by the rules of physiological traversal. Instead, they spun with my mind around dark corners and into my eyes, meeting me as an interception. An interruption. They pulled me into a body's horizon. The sun, the stars, the clouds would disappear in broad daylight. We watched the ripple as scale invariant waves. Everything was channelled through an invisible conscious heat from my rooted location, heliocentric.

a diary entry.

I am trapped in a strange machine. 

As an observer, anywhere outside of where I look is subject to increasingly strange law.

As the observed, I can no longer assume I am. 

The space around me, a force or field I at once generate and change in conjunction with my presence. 

Any hard rule which would hold where I am looking is subject to be broken outside my gaze.

Each day the rule begins to break, my key is lost before I leave my residence. I spend a small amount of time looking for it, remembering that my mind would have been shrouded in doubt. I would have assumed it was a loved one, an embodied agent of intelligence nearby.

Now, I am sure it is the machine. I am locked in a gate. It is only  temporal.

In this time, my body feels the churn of possibility. A discomfort. A belief in my state of awareness.

The relative state of awareness of my body. Knowing any divergence from local engagement would have led to this gate. Knowing a force would inhabit the space where it was and I was not. Knowing the strict principles of logic in uncertainty would lead to these possibilities.

The gate is not assigned an identifier. The physical properties of the gate are the strict possibilities bearing down on my soul. 

There are people in this place. They do not abide by the same rule. They traverse the space which is possible to traverse instead.

For everything I tolerate, I am barely tolerated. Everybody responds to me as if they know something.

Since my existence has been deemed impossible, therefore my absence predictably present, when I arrive in spaces, they have often morphed.

There are signs of growth rates declining outside of the dominant market forces. 

Cars often try to park where I am walking. Large proportions of people make the same decisions at the same time - to walk in pairs, to hold hands. On a single day, it was decided that hats were to be worn. Subtle but telling changes to the stock in shops. Portable phone chargers have been phased out in favour of car chargers. Cruelty free goods are harder to find.

Independence has again been overruled. The world bends to a darkness in decision.

Mathematical modelling, herd immunity

Herd immunity is a mathematical function of R0, the basic reproduction rate.

The higher the reproduction rate, the higher the percent of the population which must be immunized (by vaccine or previous infection)

Herd immunity threshold = 1 - (1 / R0)

If R0=2, you need to vaccinate 1 - (1/2) = 50% of the population. Think of the flu.

If R0=5, you need 1 - (1/5) = 80% of the population vaccinated. Think polio.

Measles famously has an R0 of 12+.

To reach herd immunity with measles, 1 - (1/12) = 91% at least of the population needs to be vaccinated.

The percent of the population necessary to be immunized, raises as the disease's infectiousness increases.

R0 is not an intrinsic property of a disease, it's an estimate based on mathematical models with assumptions.

Polio has an R0 of 5-7 assuming no one deliberately shits into the water. If they do, it'd be higher than this.

If everyone takes proper precautions, it'd be lower.

The *actual* R0 of a pathogen can vary wildly compared to these models. 

Flu may have an R0 of 1.3, but if everyone coughs into each other's mouths, it'll be much higher. 

It depends on environment and behaviour.

What this means is that if you model a disease to have an R0 of 5, you will need to vaccinate 80% of the population.

If you alter the environment and behaviour of people to encourage spread, you increase its R0. And you will have to vaccinate a greater percent.

If you alter the environmental conditions and behavior to minimize the spread, you reduce the R0 and the percent of population to be vaccinated, decreases.

If you take no measures against measles, you need to vaccinate against an R0=12-18 disease. You will need to vaccinate at least 91% of the population.

Every effective measure you take to limit spread, increases the bang for the buck of the vaccine.

For the flu, with an R0 of 1.3, you reach herd immunity by vaccinating 1 - (1/1.3) = 23% of the population.

You don't *need* to vaccinate 91% of the population against the flu the way you would with measles.

And if your myriad of various safety measures somehow amazingly reduced the spread of measles to the level of flu, you'd find yourself reaching herd immunity much quicker.

Relying on a vaccine *without* otherwise attempting to limit spread, means you're using that estimated R0, at least. It may be higher, if you're taking actions which encourage spread.

Suppose you have modelled a disease to have an R0 of 10, meaning you're gonna have to vaccinate 1 - (1/10)= 90% of the population.

The more measures you take to limit spread, the lower that herd immunity threshold gets. The vaccine becomes more useful the better you are at this.

If you don't limit the spread, and actually do things to encourage a higher R0, it will be even harder to reach herd immunity.

You *want* there to be multiple simultaneous policies in place to reduce R0. It means herd immunity becomes easier to achieve.

Anosognosiogenesis

@pookleblinky

·

Jan 10, 2022

Terms asserting and maintaining hierarchical relationships with marginalised groups or individuals expressed linguistically or phonetically, their epidemic spread through a population, the dynamics of dominance

User:

Research into the development of terms asserting and maintaining hierarchical relationships with marginalised groups or individuals expressed linguistically or phonetically, their epidemic spread through a population, the dynamics of dominance, potential consequences, and motivations and reward mechanisms associated with their expression, and physiological and psychological responses in their targets? 

Assistant:

 The research you are asking about examines various aspects of language that assert and maintain hierarchical relationships with marginalized groups or individuals. These terms and expressions can be overtly discriminatory or subtler forms of microaggressions. Let's explore some key areas of research in this field:

1. Development of Hierarchical Terms:

Researchers have investigated the historical origins and evolution of derogatory language used to marginalize various groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and disability. This includes studying how these terms came into being, who coined them, and how they spread through populations (Sperber & Wilson, 1986).

2. Epidemic Spread of Derogatory Terms:

Studies have examined the social and psychological factors contributing to the widespread use of discriminatory language. This includes investigating the role of peer influence, power dynamics, and societal norms in perpetuating these terms (Thorne & Henley, 1992).

3. Dynamics of Dominance:

Research has explored how power relations play a crucial role in the use and impact of discriminatory language. This includes examining the ways in which dominant groups maintain their power through linguistic means and how marginalized individuals internalize these messages (Foucault, 1975).

4. Consequences of Discriminatory Language:

Studies have documented the various negative consequences of discriminatory language for both individuals and social groups. This includes exploring the ways in which these terms can lead to psychological distress, stigma, and social exclusion (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007).

5. Motivations and Reward Mechanisms:

Research has also investigated the motivations behind using discriminatory language, such as a desire for power, control, or to assert dominance over others. Additionally, researchers have examined the potential rewards that individuals may gain from using these terms, including social acceptance and group cohesion (Swim et al., 2014).

6. Physiological Responses:

Finally, some studies have explored the physiological responses that marginalized individuals experience when exposed to discriminatory language. For example, research has shown that exposure to racial slurs can lead to increased stress and activation of the sympathetic nervous system (Rhodes et al., 2017).

Overall, this area of research is critical in understanding the ways in which language can be used to perpetuate hierarchies and marginalize individuals based on various social identities. By examining the historical origins, spread, and consequences of discriminatory language, researchers can develop interventions and policies aimed at reducing its impact and promoting greater inclusion and equality.

User:

Do you have any insight in to how dominance over marginalised groups might manifest and spread in large scale networks? In large scale conflict, there is a definite aspect of dehumanization, which could be associated with the dominant force's development of the comprehension of the marginalised group as innately flawed yet integral in their notion of their own identities and the associated formation of hierarchies around them. This could easily spread in homogenised networks of identity with few external influences promoting redefinition of their comprehension and redefinition of their collective comprehension. A relationship with an 'inferior' or marginalised subgroup or individual could also be difficult to allay, as it may play a formative role in reward mechanisms, linked with their own physiology. This juxtaposition between one's own physiological reward mechanisms, and in extreme cases, the complete disregard for others who are marginalised, is a great concern.

Can you share any insight? Are there any studies on these topics?

Assistant:

 Yes, your question touches upon some complex issues related to dominance, dehumanization, and large-scale networks. Let me provide some insights based on existing research in this area:

1. Dehumanization and Dominance:

Research has shown that dehumanizing marginalized groups can facilitate dominance and aggression towards them (Chen & Chauncey, 2014). This process involves viewing members of a marginalized group as less human or subhuman, making it easier for dominant individuals to justify their mistreatment or violence against them. This dehumanization can take various forms, including biologizing, animalizing, or objectifying marginalized groups (Lammers et al., 2017).

2. Spread of Dominance in Large-Scale Networks:

Research on social contagion and influence processes suggests that dominant attitudes and behaviors can spread through networks, especially when individuals are closely connected to one another (Centola & Macy, 2005). This can lead to the widespread adoption of discriminatory language or beliefs in large-scale networks, further marginalizing groups and reinforcing power imbalances.

3. Reward Mechanisms and Physiology:

Studies have also investigated the role of reward mechanisms and physiology in the perpetuation of dominance and discrimination (Baumeister et al., 2014). For example, research on prejudice suggests that individuals may experience positive emotions or physiological responses when engaging in discriminatory behaviors towards marginalized groups, which can reinforce their beliefs and attitudes.

4. Interventions and Countering Dominance:

To counteract dominance and the spread of discriminatory language and beliefs in large-scale networks, researchers have suggested various interventions, such as increasing contact between dominant and marginalized groups (Allport, 1954), promoting empathy and perspective-taking (Galinsky & Moskowitz, 2000), and challenging dehumanizing narratives and language (Chen et al., 2017).

Overall, there is a rich body of research on the topics you have raised, including the dynamics of dominance, dehumanization, and large-scale networks. However, more research is needed to fully understand the complex processes underlying these phenomena and to develop effective interventions for promoting greater inclusion and equality.

User:

What are your thoughts on the aforementioned idea, where dehumanisation could be associated with the dominant force's development of the comprehension of the marginalised group as innately flawed yet integral in their notion of their own identities, and the associated formation of hierarchies around them?

Assistant:

 The idea you have presented is a common perspective in social psychology and sociology research on intergroup relations and discrimination. Dehumanization, or the process by which individuals are perceived as less than human, can indeed play a role in the development of hierarchical relationships and the marginalization of certain groups (Chen & Chauncey, 2014).

This process often involves viewing members of a marginalized group as having inherent flaws or deficiencies that justify their inferior status within the dominant group's social hierarchy. These beliefs can be deeply ingrained in the dominant group's collective consciousness and identity, making it difficult to challenge them. Dehumanization also allows individuals to justify their dominance and mistreatment of marginalized groups, as they are seen as less deserving of respect and dignity (Lammers et al., 2017).

Moreover, research has shown that dehumanizing beliefs can spread through social networks, further perpetuating discrimination and reinforcing power imbalances. This can create a cycle of dominance and marginalization that is difficult to interrupt without targeted interventions (Centola & Macy, 2005).

Overall, the idea you have presented is an important one in understanding how hierarchical relationships and discrimination are perpetuated through the dehumanization of marginalized groups. It highlights the need for interventions that challenge these beliefs and promote greater empathy, perspective-taking, and inclusion across social groups.